Last time, we discussed the very controversial topic of the Jews, and the role they may be playing as we march toward a New World Order. As it turned out, they may not be behind every bad turn humanity seems to be making after all. In fact, it seems more likely that they too are being “used” by our hidden masters, to help usher in the NWO, just as other various groups have been used. Our conclusion was that their unique traits as a people, possessing a strong identity, left them well-suited for more than just a bit-part in the whole affair.
And so after taking this long tour, exploring religion from the point of view of those in power, we can draw some preliminary conclusions:
First, religion is useful for the effective control and management of people, due to the principle that self-control, will always be more efficient than any external means of control, such as police.
Second, it is reasonable to assume that those in power have long ago recognized the fact that religion is so important for their ends.
Third, to achieve their goal to expand their power with the assistance of religion, they might easily create religions and organizations, clubs and lodges, that they deemed useful for their ends. They could also infiltrate and subvert existing religions / organizations, to bring them under their influence, and eventual control.
Fourth, nations / peoples would also be subverted, harnessed and controlled. The key idea here, if a people should possess an identity, that identity would tend toward cohesiveness, which would mean that the entire group could potentially be mobilized, if necessary. The stronger the identity, the more potent the tool, and thus the Jews were logically “chosen” to play a central role in bringing in the NWO, since those in power would be unable to resist harnessing such a useful force, as they pursued their goals.
But these subversions were not occurring in a vacuum. Everywhere, through every channel, people would be recruited to the cause, most unwittingly, as various banners went up, and people naturally followed. Socialism, Communism, Naturalism…”ism” after ism could effectively divide the masses (so later they could more easily be conquered). Religious revivals and denominational divisions, new cults, new evangelism, and even the deployment of technology to put emphasis to that which best furthered the over all agenda, all this was coming into play. Perhaps those in power did not write the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, but they could have. As mentioned in the Protocols, through the professions, science, academia, politics and of course, churches, synagogues and lodges, all would proceed according to plan, which would eventually deliver a powerful hegemony to the Chosen. Or, were they only patsies, playing their role?
It’s time to take another step back, to better appreciate the immense power that is apparently unfolding before us, as we consider those in power, who have for centuries (some say millennia), worked to consolidate and perpetuate their power. If you have been persuaded that there are indeed very powerful people, multi-generational families, nobility and royalty, that have the wealth, power and desire to extend and maximize their power, then it may be easier to accept that they have already achieved a high level of success. In other words, the world we see today is in fact a “product” of those aggressive pursuits of power, and the landscape we look out on to, was made by them, and for them.
This includes most especially that which you believe. They have enjoyed the power to create, and subvert religions for many generations. They also have the power to virtually rewrite history, as it suits them. They harness whole nations, pit one against another, control finance, and therefore economies. They appoint judges, they have Presidents elected, and make sure that their media organs comply, all to weave a web, or perhaps better put, to fashion the chain, forged to enslave your mind.
All this has already come to pass, and yet, the plan is not yet complete. Remember, the only thing you would want as the wealthiest person in the world, would be more power. Such an insatiable dynamic has governed the evolution of society, and is behind all of history, even if they should shroud it’s truer versions.
With all this in mind, imagine now if you will the “perfect” religion for those who would serve you. They would dogmatically embrace, all that you have dictated. They would not just obey you, they would imagine that they were in obedience to the highest entity imaginable! They would, in their enslaved minds, obey God, and yet, you would know that it was you to whom in fact that they gave obedience, since it was you who had given them that which to believe. Perhaps you are a cruel master, but no worries, the slaves will not revolt! They truly believe that they must obey, this is their lot in life. And perhaps afterwards, they can imagine a “heaven” where they might finally “rest”, but for now, they must SERVE! Doesn’t this sound at least a bit familiar already?
Time to rejoice! This wonderful slave religion is already here, hallelujah! No, rather Baha’u’llah! It is called the Baha’i Faith, and while relatively “new”, it goes back only 150 years, it seems uniquely suited for the world’s slave population. It conveniently embraces ALL the main religions of the world, and claims to be where each of the old religions always pointed to. A universal and incredibly inclusive monotheistic religion that is based primarily on Islam, Baha’i also reaches out powerfully to Christians, and even Jews. Almost unbelievably, followers of Krishna and Buddhists also have a special place within Baha’i! No wonder it is the “religion of the United Nations,” but more on that later.
This religion, far ahead of it’s time, is completely tolerant of all. Since they don’t believe in Satan, or evil in the usual sense, they also seem to have no fear whatsoever of concentrating all power into one world government. They also advocate one-world language. Total equality of women worldwide (still an issue within Islam of course). One-world court. One universal calendar. They hold inter-racial marriage as a high ideal! They were pushing for a League of Nations as far back as 1875. And on and on.
You would be hard put to formulate a more syncretistic religion if you tried. It is as if someone thought about exactly that. The question may have been, “What kind of religion could we envision for all mankind, while taking into consideration the enormous differences that presently exist?” Answer: Baha’i. “What kind of religious faith could result in the eventual eradication, through mixing, of all races?” Answer: Baha’i. “What sort of universal quasi-religious concepts could possibly advocate one-world government? Answer: Baha’i. And again, on and on.
In order to create such a religion, one would have to accept the reality of a long-term plan. Perhaps the questions imagined above were asked at some point, but consider that it may have already been centuries ago. In preparation, some key pieces would have to be “pre-positioned”, so that at the appropriate time, all could fall into place.
Enter the United States of America. Yes, even the founding of a nation would have something to do with the “religious” part of the plan. The significance of America is that she is the world’s present “universal” nation. Not since Rome, and perhaps before that, since the ancient Atlantis of myth, has there been a nation on Earth that could lay claim to some semblance of universality. True, England accomplished an Empire where the sun would never set, but they could never quite qualify as a universal center, due to their history. On the other hand, that old English power could be seen to continue to this day, through America, but now adequately sanitized of it’s ugly past. And so a proto-type “universal nation” was created, that would one day play a central role in “universalizing” the entire world, into one body.
Within this young USA, not long after it’s founding, a young Joseph Smith made some incredible revelations. He said that he had found Golden Tablets, met with God / Jesus and / or the Angel “Moroni”, and then took dictation for what would become the famous Book of Mormon. Interestingly, Mormons “coincidentally” utilize much Masonic symbolism, but then again, many believe that the Prophet Smith was a Mason. Also, here was a recent example of a “Christian” church, that advocated plural marriage! Can we think of another major world denomination that has a Prophet, and also advocates plural marriage? Yes, Islam. Mormonism, seen from this perspective, is a kind of “Christian Islam”. My goodness, if we could just get yet another “Big Tent” religion to enter the scene, perhaps something interesting might still happen!
And now, back to Baha’i. Back in 1912, the leader of Baha’i actually came to America, and toured, making speeches, and making “prophesies”, etc. In one famous prophesy, he said “Armageddon” would begin in two years! Two years later, the First World War, which today is interpreted accordingly. But he also preached about the coming one-world government, and for some odd reason, made a special stop at…Salt Lake City!
His name was Abdu’l-Baha, son of Baha’u’llah, and he headed straight for the Mormon Temple! There, it is said that he “knocked” (on the East door), but it was not opened to him. Perhaps of no importance you may be thinking? On the contrary, the stage was now set!
Until next time…
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Sunday, May 16, 2010
The Coming Slave Religion, Part 3...But, What About...The Jews??
Few topics could be more controversial these days, but if we're going to discuss religion, we would be remiss in our duty if we ignored Jews and Judaism. While this group is relatively small compared to others, their importance is magnified for several reasons. First, theirs is the first "Abrahamic" religion, and obviously the two that followed, Christianity and Islam, are huge today. Second, it is generally accepted that Jews, despite their smaller numbers, exert a disproportionate amount of power and influence in the world. Third, Jews possess an “identity”, regardless of the religion they practice, or fail to practice. They do in-fact feel as if they are a “nation”, even if they live in hundreds of countries around the globe, meaning that they continue to have a loyalty to their own, no matter where they live. Therefore, their collective "role" if you will, should be examined carefully, especially as it pertains to our thesis, which involves a coming "slave-religion".
For centuries, Jews have been almost "universally" vilified, and most especially in Europe, where their numbers were greatest. This being the case, it isn't hard to imagine that many Jews were in fact "victimized" by what had become a "cultural thing" in Europe. Europe was mostly Christian of course, so in a way it was perfectly "natural" to treat Jews, Muslims, Gypsies, etc., as outsiders. Even if some of these people "converted", they remained under suspicion, with the perfect example being furnished by the "Conversos" of Spain 500 years ago. As the Spanish conquered the Iberian peninsula, Moors were driven further south, and Jews who chose to remain, were put in the difficult position of choosing either "demotion" to second-class subjects, or to "convert", and continue to enjoy the privileges that they had become accustomed to under the Moors, who had considerably softened by the Fourteenth Century. As we know, many apparently chose to "convert". While some conversions were perhaps genuine, it is generally held that most of these conversions were not true at all. They were done for convenience, based on the situation, and so what evolved were formerly "Jewish" families, who now had a Christian exterior, but secretly maintained their Jewish tradition and identity.
So far, the above may not be terribly controversial, although no doubt there are those who are biting their tongues, thinking that the interpretation holds the Jews in a positive light that they haven't earned. This could be because one way of regarding the history of the Jews is to assert that they "deserved" much of the ill treatment they received, due to their "disloyalty", usurious money-lending, suspected crimes performed in secret, etc. Either way, it seems fair to say that, for whatever reasons, Jews have passed through an interesting history that I would guess explains much of what we see in Jews today.
And what might that be? For starters, there is the instability in the Middle East, ever since Zionists found themselves competing with the Palestinians for the land that would become the nation of Israel. No, this isn't saying the Jews are responsible for the instability of themselves, but it is curious that wherever they find themselves, it could even be said that "when" ever they find themselves, there is a clash, and there is no better way to say it, but it seems that everyone ends up "hating" the Jews. Of course, this is hardly a "politically correct" thing to utter, but it's damn close to the truth, and many Jews over the past century especially, have written extensively about exactly this. While you may not "hate" Jews, most perhaps do feel "hated", unwelcome, not trusted, treated as outsiders (in spite of smiles and handshakes, etc.) Add to this the more recent unpleasant Nazi era history, and it's easy to see why Israel appears so "harsh" to the rest of the world. In other words, Jews in general, seem to really believe that they have been unfairly "persecuted", and it's possible that many of their collective actions are at least partially explained by this shared viewpoint.
This situation suggests a rather unhealthy dynamic of course, not that different than that of many other racial groups that feel persecuted, or interpret their particular histories with continuing bitterness toward the historical oppressor. Black people in America may easily "relate", as they look back at not just the slavery of their ancestors, but even very recent institutionalized discrimination, especially in the South. It could be said that this shared history "colors" their outlook. Are you a white man, who has a black employee? You aren't just the boss, but you're "The Man"! And even if you both get along just fine, even if you both enjoy true friendship, there is a "something" there in between, and there's little you can do about it.
And so, the Jewish "subculture" if you wish, certainly contains unhealthy elements due to their perceived history, and explains behavior in the same way as it does when considering any other racial group. But here's the big difference: As mentioned in the first paragraph of this post, Jews seem to exert far more power than their small numbers would lead one to believe at first glance. No, this isn't just a faulty perception. If you have read any articles intended for Jewish readership, perhaps in a Jewish periodical, or on a Jewish website, one thing you come away with is their laudable sense of pride in their accomplishments. No, this isn't a bad thing at all, anymore than it is wrong for black people to take pride in having Barack Obama as president. But it shouldn't be too controversial to state that Jewish wealth and power, compared to other peoples, gives them an edge when it comes to important decisions in politics, medicine, law, and yes, even religion! In every area you can find a strong Jewish representation. Probably the best example is Jewish influence in the media. It would be no exaggeration to say that they "own" much of the media we turn to when we want news and entertainment. Further, this isn't something denied necessarily by Jews, who may justifiably take pride in the fact that their people are making such giant strides. But arguments are still going to arise when interpreting what this means for the rest of us. Because with such power should come responsibility, and yet, if there is one certainty, power corrupts...
By now, some may have decided that we are surely leading up to "antisemitism", even though we have managed to pretend for a while. But that's not where we're going, unless you choose to "color" it so. Instead of trying to figure out how the Jews are manipulating things, or leveraging their obvious power, we need to take a hard look at how the Jews might themselves be "used"! No, this isn't what "either side" normally would prefer to consider, but I believe it's relevant to the world's situation today, so at the risk of irritating pretty much everyone, I'm going to tackle it.
Jews today find themselves in positions of power more than at any other time in history, worldwide. Sure, we have a "black" president in the US, but his cabinet has incredibly strong Jewish representation. And so did "W"'s cabinet, and as far as Clinton's, well it's almost legendary. It could be fairly said that "most" top government positions are occupied by Jews. A recent Supreme Court nominee? Jewish. Name the most powerful lobby in the US? Is their job to secure continued funding for Israel? And on and on. Is it any wonder the Arab world considers the US and Israel as virtually the same entity? Recognizing these things should not be considered anything more than calling a spade a spade. It is our present reality. And this situation does not just exist in government, but in other important fields, such as medicine and law, Jews have seemingly gained remarkable ascendancy, for what ever reasons. In short, we must consider the fact that Jews literally "dominate" the US, in the most important ways. When you consider the fact that this is also much the case in other nations as well, it isn't hard to see why some "conspiracy" theorists cast serious suspicion on Jews, and boldly wonder what they might be up to.
After all this, I would suggest that it's still quite possible that worldwide Jewish leadership, as obvious as it is, is anything but obviously nefarious. As many Jews might point out, their "rule", if you would characterize it that way, is benign. They are good doctors. Good lawyers. True, many are on the more "liberal" end of the political spectrum, but by and large, they have championed the rights of the downtrodden, etc. And besides, if there was a "Jewish Conspiracy", how on Earth could such a thing really work? Are they giving out orders in the synagogue? Do they all belong to secret organizations, and communicate with secret signs? You see, when you think it through, such a thing begins to collapse.
BUT, when considering the possibility that the Jews, as a cohesive subcultural group, could be "used" in some way, here we should not be too quick to dismiss the possibility. Because to do such a thing would NOT necessarily require a widespread "conspiracy". The "manipulation" of the Jews could be accomplished by simply harnessing their unique traits (good or bad), or perhaps more believable, we might ask, could the Jews, as a cohesive people, be effectively "guided", if such a thing suited those "really" in power?
I think that the reasonable person would answer YES. Just as various minority groups throughout the world have been "manipulated", so it could be with the Jews. Were the blacks involved in civil rights protests "guided" back in the 1960's? The evidence shows they were, more than some would like to believe. Who was always the head of the NAACP (until relatively recently)? No, not Martin Luther King, Jr., but Jews. No, this shouldn't be regarded as a kind of vilification of Jews at all. Perhaps many honestly believe this was yet another manifestation of Jewish civic responsibility. (In fact, it is part of the Jewish identity to regard themselves as something of a "gift" to mankind.) Right or wrong, it was correctly determined that it was the "right time", and that black anger could be a useful catalyst for change. This is history, and it is rather recent too.
Now let us imagine that we are that fanciful "Prince" from earlier posts, yes, of Machiavellian flavor. You believe your destiny is to rule, and you have considered the strengths, and weaknesses of the Jewish people. After all, the more you think of it, it seems that they are uniquely suited to help further your goals. How so? They have this admirable loyalty to their own, and you have observed that if one is being attacked, the others quickly close ranks, and protect. In fact, even if certain Jews have expressed contrary views (as an example, perhaps they are anti-Zionist), when another Jew is being attacked, they seem to be able to put many of their own differences aside. In short, the old saying comes to mind: Blood is thicker than water. And you approve, because such a beautiful idea is nowhere better expressed than in your own family lineage, where only your noble Blood is sacred.
You look to their weaknesses. You notice how convenient it is, the world already hates them! Nice. You wonder how best to use these people. In fact, the more you think of it, the more you resolve to bring the matter to the King's attention (your father). You explain the matter to him, and you can see he likes your idea, most certainly he approves, he is nodding his head as he always does when such is the case. But when you finish, you see the huge smile breaking out on his face, and it is too reminiscent of the one you remembered on your grandfather's face, years ago, when you had first observed how useful it would be to create a religion. "My boy! Walk with me..." Your father, the august and mighty King of the realm, now shares with you the news that your incredible family has already "been there, done that"! "And the Nazi's father?" "How could it be otherwise?!" Once again, while you are surprised, you're really not. You feel that old sense of pride welling up. "Truly, we are born to rule!"
I would submit that such a scenario has likely taken place, in some way, already, and perhaps longer-ago than we dare imagine. You might learn one day about the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", and see in them (now over a century old), some very provocative and prescient "directions", ostensibly for the Jewish people at the time, which seem to have "come true". No, I would not care to automatically characterize the infamous Protocols as just another Jewish slander, but Jews should take another look at them, and instead of taking the knee-jerk route, look again. Forgery? Probably. But regardless of "who" wrote them, Jews should consider the possibility that they are in fact a bit of "evidence" that they "might" be victims, yet again, but in a way that might make "Nazi" sound nice. Because if they are being manipulated somehow, it could explain a whole lot. Further, we should ask that if this is the case today, how can the Jews get off the train at all? Even those few who recognize the extent to which they are apparently being used are treated quite badly by their own. It reminds one of the black subculture, where perhaps a smart young man decides he would like to study math, or go to college, etc., and from his own people he will be slammed as an "Oreo", a wanna-be white, etc. When do they stop to consider how such an attitude (regarding learning as "white") is exactly the kind of thing that is their "real" problem! And if the white man really was their enemy, you could even go further, and imagine that terribly retrogressive idea being intentionally "planted", a long time ago on the plantation.
Yes, such notions are a "stretch" for today's media-immersed chaser of bread and circuses, but the general notion at least needs to be considered. Why? Because the whole point is that segments of the human race are being used to further an agenda that may indeed one day lead to the total enslavement of mankind! It's that "Big". Again, in a nutshell: The mere fact that a people (any people) possess "identity", is the very reason they can / are being used by the powers-that-be (and yes, some of these hidden masters may indeed be Jewish as well!). Please stop your knee from jerking, and consider this: Hitler used the Germans. Is it so hard to imagine that Jews were the first to see the “power” in their own people, and therefore the first to exploit such a power? No, this doesn’t mean that Jews are behind it all, but they seemingly have a large piece of the pie. The world is indeed a play, and we all merely players, but I would submit that the role of the Jews is hardly a bit-part in the Play.
Next time, we'll get back to the perfect Slave Religion, because it's coming...
For centuries, Jews have been almost "universally" vilified, and most especially in Europe, where their numbers were greatest. This being the case, it isn't hard to imagine that many Jews were in fact "victimized" by what had become a "cultural thing" in Europe. Europe was mostly Christian of course, so in a way it was perfectly "natural" to treat Jews, Muslims, Gypsies, etc., as outsiders. Even if some of these people "converted", they remained under suspicion, with the perfect example being furnished by the "Conversos" of Spain 500 years ago. As the Spanish conquered the Iberian peninsula, Moors were driven further south, and Jews who chose to remain, were put in the difficult position of choosing either "demotion" to second-class subjects, or to "convert", and continue to enjoy the privileges that they had become accustomed to under the Moors, who had considerably softened by the Fourteenth Century. As we know, many apparently chose to "convert". While some conversions were perhaps genuine, it is generally held that most of these conversions were not true at all. They were done for convenience, based on the situation, and so what evolved were formerly "Jewish" families, who now had a Christian exterior, but secretly maintained their Jewish tradition and identity.
So far, the above may not be terribly controversial, although no doubt there are those who are biting their tongues, thinking that the interpretation holds the Jews in a positive light that they haven't earned. This could be because one way of regarding the history of the Jews is to assert that they "deserved" much of the ill treatment they received, due to their "disloyalty", usurious money-lending, suspected crimes performed in secret, etc. Either way, it seems fair to say that, for whatever reasons, Jews have passed through an interesting history that I would guess explains much of what we see in Jews today.
And what might that be? For starters, there is the instability in the Middle East, ever since Zionists found themselves competing with the Palestinians for the land that would become the nation of Israel. No, this isn't saying the Jews are responsible for the instability of themselves, but it is curious that wherever they find themselves, it could even be said that "when" ever they find themselves, there is a clash, and there is no better way to say it, but it seems that everyone ends up "hating" the Jews. Of course, this is hardly a "politically correct" thing to utter, but it's damn close to the truth, and many Jews over the past century especially, have written extensively about exactly this. While you may not "hate" Jews, most perhaps do feel "hated", unwelcome, not trusted, treated as outsiders (in spite of smiles and handshakes, etc.) Add to this the more recent unpleasant Nazi era history, and it's easy to see why Israel appears so "harsh" to the rest of the world. In other words, Jews in general, seem to really believe that they have been unfairly "persecuted", and it's possible that many of their collective actions are at least partially explained by this shared viewpoint.
This situation suggests a rather unhealthy dynamic of course, not that different than that of many other racial groups that feel persecuted, or interpret their particular histories with continuing bitterness toward the historical oppressor. Black people in America may easily "relate", as they look back at not just the slavery of their ancestors, but even very recent institutionalized discrimination, especially in the South. It could be said that this shared history "colors" their outlook. Are you a white man, who has a black employee? You aren't just the boss, but you're "The Man"! And even if you both get along just fine, even if you both enjoy true friendship, there is a "something" there in between, and there's little you can do about it.
And so, the Jewish "subculture" if you wish, certainly contains unhealthy elements due to their perceived history, and explains behavior in the same way as it does when considering any other racial group. But here's the big difference: As mentioned in the first paragraph of this post, Jews seem to exert far more power than their small numbers would lead one to believe at first glance. No, this isn't just a faulty perception. If you have read any articles intended for Jewish readership, perhaps in a Jewish periodical, or on a Jewish website, one thing you come away with is their laudable sense of pride in their accomplishments. No, this isn't a bad thing at all, anymore than it is wrong for black people to take pride in having Barack Obama as president. But it shouldn't be too controversial to state that Jewish wealth and power, compared to other peoples, gives them an edge when it comes to important decisions in politics, medicine, law, and yes, even religion! In every area you can find a strong Jewish representation. Probably the best example is Jewish influence in the media. It would be no exaggeration to say that they "own" much of the media we turn to when we want news and entertainment. Further, this isn't something denied necessarily by Jews, who may justifiably take pride in the fact that their people are making such giant strides. But arguments are still going to arise when interpreting what this means for the rest of us. Because with such power should come responsibility, and yet, if there is one certainty, power corrupts...
By now, some may have decided that we are surely leading up to "antisemitism", even though we have managed to pretend for a while. But that's not where we're going, unless you choose to "color" it so. Instead of trying to figure out how the Jews are manipulating things, or leveraging their obvious power, we need to take a hard look at how the Jews might themselves be "used"! No, this isn't what "either side" normally would prefer to consider, but I believe it's relevant to the world's situation today, so at the risk of irritating pretty much everyone, I'm going to tackle it.
Jews today find themselves in positions of power more than at any other time in history, worldwide. Sure, we have a "black" president in the US, but his cabinet has incredibly strong Jewish representation. And so did "W"'s cabinet, and as far as Clinton's, well it's almost legendary. It could be fairly said that "most" top government positions are occupied by Jews. A recent Supreme Court nominee? Jewish. Name the most powerful lobby in the US? Is their job to secure continued funding for Israel? And on and on. Is it any wonder the Arab world considers the US and Israel as virtually the same entity? Recognizing these things should not be considered anything more than calling a spade a spade. It is our present reality. And this situation does not just exist in government, but in other important fields, such as medicine and law, Jews have seemingly gained remarkable ascendancy, for what ever reasons. In short, we must consider the fact that Jews literally "dominate" the US, in the most important ways. When you consider the fact that this is also much the case in other nations as well, it isn't hard to see why some "conspiracy" theorists cast serious suspicion on Jews, and boldly wonder what they might be up to.
After all this, I would suggest that it's still quite possible that worldwide Jewish leadership, as obvious as it is, is anything but obviously nefarious. As many Jews might point out, their "rule", if you would characterize it that way, is benign. They are good doctors. Good lawyers. True, many are on the more "liberal" end of the political spectrum, but by and large, they have championed the rights of the downtrodden, etc. And besides, if there was a "Jewish Conspiracy", how on Earth could such a thing really work? Are they giving out orders in the synagogue? Do they all belong to secret organizations, and communicate with secret signs? You see, when you think it through, such a thing begins to collapse.
BUT, when considering the possibility that the Jews, as a cohesive subcultural group, could be "used" in some way, here we should not be too quick to dismiss the possibility. Because to do such a thing would NOT necessarily require a widespread "conspiracy". The "manipulation" of the Jews could be accomplished by simply harnessing their unique traits (good or bad), or perhaps more believable, we might ask, could the Jews, as a cohesive people, be effectively "guided", if such a thing suited those "really" in power?
I think that the reasonable person would answer YES. Just as various minority groups throughout the world have been "manipulated", so it could be with the Jews. Were the blacks involved in civil rights protests "guided" back in the 1960's? The evidence shows they were, more than some would like to believe. Who was always the head of the NAACP (until relatively recently)? No, not Martin Luther King, Jr., but Jews. No, this shouldn't be regarded as a kind of vilification of Jews at all. Perhaps many honestly believe this was yet another manifestation of Jewish civic responsibility. (In fact, it is part of the Jewish identity to regard themselves as something of a "gift" to mankind.) Right or wrong, it was correctly determined that it was the "right time", and that black anger could be a useful catalyst for change. This is history, and it is rather recent too.
Now let us imagine that we are that fanciful "Prince" from earlier posts, yes, of Machiavellian flavor. You believe your destiny is to rule, and you have considered the strengths, and weaknesses of the Jewish people. After all, the more you think of it, it seems that they are uniquely suited to help further your goals. How so? They have this admirable loyalty to their own, and you have observed that if one is being attacked, the others quickly close ranks, and protect. In fact, even if certain Jews have expressed contrary views (as an example, perhaps they are anti-Zionist), when another Jew is being attacked, they seem to be able to put many of their own differences aside. In short, the old saying comes to mind: Blood is thicker than water. And you approve, because such a beautiful idea is nowhere better expressed than in your own family lineage, where only your noble Blood is sacred.
You look to their weaknesses. You notice how convenient it is, the world already hates them! Nice. You wonder how best to use these people. In fact, the more you think of it, the more you resolve to bring the matter to the King's attention (your father). You explain the matter to him, and you can see he likes your idea, most certainly he approves, he is nodding his head as he always does when such is the case. But when you finish, you see the huge smile breaking out on his face, and it is too reminiscent of the one you remembered on your grandfather's face, years ago, when you had first observed how useful it would be to create a religion. "My boy! Walk with me..." Your father, the august and mighty King of the realm, now shares with you the news that your incredible family has already "been there, done that"! "And the Nazi's father?" "How could it be otherwise?!" Once again, while you are surprised, you're really not. You feel that old sense of pride welling up. "Truly, we are born to rule!"
I would submit that such a scenario has likely taken place, in some way, already, and perhaps longer-ago than we dare imagine. You might learn one day about the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", and see in them (now over a century old), some very provocative and prescient "directions", ostensibly for the Jewish people at the time, which seem to have "come true". No, I would not care to automatically characterize the infamous Protocols as just another Jewish slander, but Jews should take another look at them, and instead of taking the knee-jerk route, look again. Forgery? Probably. But regardless of "who" wrote them, Jews should consider the possibility that they are in fact a bit of "evidence" that they "might" be victims, yet again, but in a way that might make "Nazi" sound nice. Because if they are being manipulated somehow, it could explain a whole lot. Further, we should ask that if this is the case today, how can the Jews get off the train at all? Even those few who recognize the extent to which they are apparently being used are treated quite badly by their own. It reminds one of the black subculture, where perhaps a smart young man decides he would like to study math, or go to college, etc., and from his own people he will be slammed as an "Oreo", a wanna-be white, etc. When do they stop to consider how such an attitude (regarding learning as "white") is exactly the kind of thing that is their "real" problem! And if the white man really was their enemy, you could even go further, and imagine that terribly retrogressive idea being intentionally "planted", a long time ago on the plantation.
Yes, such notions are a "stretch" for today's media-immersed chaser of bread and circuses, but the general notion at least needs to be considered. Why? Because the whole point is that segments of the human race are being used to further an agenda that may indeed one day lead to the total enslavement of mankind! It's that "Big". Again, in a nutshell: The mere fact that a people (any people) possess "identity", is the very reason they can / are being used by the powers-that-be (and yes, some of these hidden masters may indeed be Jewish as well!). Please stop your knee from jerking, and consider this: Hitler used the Germans. Is it so hard to imagine that Jews were the first to see the “power” in their own people, and therefore the first to exploit such a power? No, this doesn’t mean that Jews are behind it all, but they seemingly have a large piece of the pie. The world is indeed a play, and we all merely players, but I would submit that the role of the Jews is hardly a bit-part in the Play.
Next time, we'll get back to the perfect Slave Religion, because it's coming...
Labels:
blacks,
Christianity,
civil rights,
conspiracy,
hitler,
Jews,
Judaism,
religion
Sunday, May 9, 2010
The Coming Slave Religion, Part Two: A Look At Religion Through the Eyes of Our Masters
In the last post, we considered the possibility that wealthy and powerful people might do all sorts of things to preserve their power and position. We might think of the world's "royal" families, or perhaps the infamous Bush or Rothschild clans. It seems reasonable to expect them to do whatever it takes to maintain their status, even if the world is moving away from monarchies and nobility. Some of the things they have done, and are likely doing even now, may involve espionage, "secret societies", and even the waging of all out hot wars.
Another thing they would likely find useful is religion. In many ways, religion can be shown to be beneficial to the "management" of people, and lends general order to a society, since "self-control" is easily more efficient than having to maintain huge police power. At a minimum, it can help preserve the status quo, but religion could be used "offensively" as well, not merely as defense. So let's consider religion in this context. As a multi-generational master of the universe, you might wonder what an "ideal" religion would look like, from your point of view. Since you plan on maintaining (even increasing) power, for you and your descendants, in perpetuity, naturally you focus on the factors in religion that would tend to further your goals. But alas, you are not god (yet!), and so you go "shopping" around the world, evaluating the various existing religions. You decide that each has some merit, but to be honest, you're not entirely satisfied with any one of them. Suddenly, the light bulb goes on! Why not just create the "perfect" religion yourself? Oh, you can't wait to tell Duke Grand PaPa your splendid idea!
As you finish your little speech about creating a "perfect" religion for your subjects, you are happy to see that the Duke seems as pleased with you, as you do with yourself. His usual wry smile seems especially in alignment with the sparkle in his eyes, and he has patiently listened to your plans, with obvious pride in his Blood. And while you would be correct in your deduction (he is proud of his Blood!), it isn't because of your brilliant idea at all! In fact, he puts his arm around your shoulder, and invites you to take a stroll...
"You have proved yourself ready for yet another family secret my boy." Your heart skips a beat. You recall the time when they shared with you the secret of "true marriage", and you relished the memory. "The fact of the matter is that we have been creating, infiltrating and controlling religions to serve our purposes...for centuries!" Your mind reels! Of course! It all made sense now!
Obviously a bit of fiction here, but could we not see some version of this scenario playing out in reality? Remember, there are very wealthy and powerful people, generations of families that not only have a "motive" to do such a thing as create a religion, but they might also have the means to do so. And today this would apply as never before!
In the last post, I mentioned Dianetics. No, it's hardly a "slave-religion" for the masses (too expensive!), but it is a good example of a recent man-made "religion" that had various purposes, easily beyond what was released for public consumption. Not to get into the whole affair, but it might be fairly "obvious" that one of the reasons for Dianetics has everything to do with "who" the members are. Many names we know, such as John Wayne, or John Travolta. People in the public eye. Regardless of what you believe about this "religion", there can be no doubt it is important, because the people influenced are important. Now, if you factor in the mind control that is their forte, and it's multiplied effect throughout the "audience", we might easily wonder who would have gained from putting together such a religion.
And so it is going back in history, as we evaluate various religions that seem rather well-suited to maintaining a ruling elite. We could begin with Christianity. As most know, the traditional version of this religion is essentially a believe-or-burn (forever) formulation. Automatically, we see that "fear" is the operative element. No, that doesn't mean it is "fabricated" by an elite, but it could easily indicate it has been subverted, or molded to fit into the desired paradigm of those powerful enough to subvert, and then gain by such a subversion. As a major "proto" religion for many Western variations, "Christianity" has been used, and continues to be used today, by those in power.
Islam is another major world religion that should be examined. Also utilizing a "fear-based" approach, Islam is the religion of a billion plus people in the world today. Those in "control" surely would have reason to subvert, exploit, and mold such a religion, even if at first glance the task seemed daunting. In fact, one way or the other, it needs to at least be "accounted for" as plans for total control are implemented. Not taking it into account could lead to blunders, and too many of those could possibly cascade into the eventual collapse of a powerful dynasty. Certainly, Islam needs to be understood, and then harnessed accordingly.
How about Eastern "religion"? First, we have to be careful not to include those "religions" that are actually philosophies instead. Sure, a philosophy can be dangerous too, but in general, their power pales in comparison to the fiery power of fanatic religion. So Buddhism, Taoism...they're out. Don't worry too much. Although, there are hybrid forms, such as Tibetan Buddhism that could be trouble, but fortunately, they are small, and virtually irrelevant at the moment. That leaves Hinduism. Fortunately for the elite, Hinduism, while practiced by a huge percentage of the world's population, is not "a" religion, but it is literally thousands of them. Not that it's completely irrelevant, but it's power is not necessarily "negative" from a control point of view. In other words, it would take a lot to get Hindus to cooperate in any significant fashion, beyond the cultural power beneath. Instead, the real "power" of the Hindu lies in the shear weight of their collective ancient myth. To simplify, we might call this a "Vedic" myth, or perspective. I would suggest that it has already been "harnessed" rather nicely over the past century in the form of what is today called: The New Age Movement.
Truly, religion is powerful, and we could easily imagine a modern Machiavelli counseling the wise use of it by his Prince. Next time, back to the present, and America, and on to: The Future...
Another thing they would likely find useful is religion. In many ways, religion can be shown to be beneficial to the "management" of people, and lends general order to a society, since "self-control" is easily more efficient than having to maintain huge police power. At a minimum, it can help preserve the status quo, but religion could be used "offensively" as well, not merely as defense. So let's consider religion in this context. As a multi-generational master of the universe, you might wonder what an "ideal" religion would look like, from your point of view. Since you plan on maintaining (even increasing) power, for you and your descendants, in perpetuity, naturally you focus on the factors in religion that would tend to further your goals. But alas, you are not god (yet!), and so you go "shopping" around the world, evaluating the various existing religions. You decide that each has some merit, but to be honest, you're not entirely satisfied with any one of them. Suddenly, the light bulb goes on! Why not just create the "perfect" religion yourself? Oh, you can't wait to tell Duke Grand PaPa your splendid idea!
As you finish your little speech about creating a "perfect" religion for your subjects, you are happy to see that the Duke seems as pleased with you, as you do with yourself. His usual wry smile seems especially in alignment with the sparkle in his eyes, and he has patiently listened to your plans, with obvious pride in his Blood. And while you would be correct in your deduction (he is proud of his Blood!), it isn't because of your brilliant idea at all! In fact, he puts his arm around your shoulder, and invites you to take a stroll...
"You have proved yourself ready for yet another family secret my boy." Your heart skips a beat. You recall the time when they shared with you the secret of "true marriage", and you relished the memory. "The fact of the matter is that we have been creating, infiltrating and controlling religions to serve our purposes...for centuries!" Your mind reels! Of course! It all made sense now!
Obviously a bit of fiction here, but could we not see some version of this scenario playing out in reality? Remember, there are very wealthy and powerful people, generations of families that not only have a "motive" to do such a thing as create a religion, but they might also have the means to do so. And today this would apply as never before!
In the last post, I mentioned Dianetics. No, it's hardly a "slave-religion" for the masses (too expensive!), but it is a good example of a recent man-made "religion" that had various purposes, easily beyond what was released for public consumption. Not to get into the whole affair, but it might be fairly "obvious" that one of the reasons for Dianetics has everything to do with "who" the members are. Many names we know, such as John Wayne, or John Travolta. People in the public eye. Regardless of what you believe about this "religion", there can be no doubt it is important, because the people influenced are important. Now, if you factor in the mind control that is their forte, and it's multiplied effect throughout the "audience", we might easily wonder who would have gained from putting together such a religion.
And so it is going back in history, as we evaluate various religions that seem rather well-suited to maintaining a ruling elite. We could begin with Christianity. As most know, the traditional version of this religion is essentially a believe-or-burn (forever) formulation. Automatically, we see that "fear" is the operative element. No, that doesn't mean it is "fabricated" by an elite, but it could easily indicate it has been subverted, or molded to fit into the desired paradigm of those powerful enough to subvert, and then gain by such a subversion. As a major "proto" religion for many Western variations, "Christianity" has been used, and continues to be used today, by those in power.
Islam is another major world religion that should be examined. Also utilizing a "fear-based" approach, Islam is the religion of a billion plus people in the world today. Those in "control" surely would have reason to subvert, exploit, and mold such a religion, even if at first glance the task seemed daunting. In fact, one way or the other, it needs to at least be "accounted for" as plans for total control are implemented. Not taking it into account could lead to blunders, and too many of those could possibly cascade into the eventual collapse of a powerful dynasty. Certainly, Islam needs to be understood, and then harnessed accordingly.
How about Eastern "religion"? First, we have to be careful not to include those "religions" that are actually philosophies instead. Sure, a philosophy can be dangerous too, but in general, their power pales in comparison to the fiery power of fanatic religion. So Buddhism, Taoism...they're out. Don't worry too much. Although, there are hybrid forms, such as Tibetan Buddhism that could be trouble, but fortunately, they are small, and virtually irrelevant at the moment. That leaves Hinduism. Fortunately for the elite, Hinduism, while practiced by a huge percentage of the world's population, is not "a" religion, but it is literally thousands of them. Not that it's completely irrelevant, but it's power is not necessarily "negative" from a control point of view. In other words, it would take a lot to get Hindus to cooperate in any significant fashion, beyond the cultural power beneath. Instead, the real "power" of the Hindu lies in the shear weight of their collective ancient myth. To simplify, we might call this a "Vedic" myth, or perspective. I would suggest that it has already been "harnessed" rather nicely over the past century in the form of what is today called: The New Age Movement.
Truly, religion is powerful, and we could easily imagine a modern Machiavelli counseling the wise use of it by his Prince. Next time, back to the present, and America, and on to: The Future...
Friday, May 7, 2010
Masonry, Mormonism and...Islam?? A Slave Religion for the Coming Plantation. Part One
Imagine that the world is your oyster! You have money, and power, prestige and even pride in your ancestry. In fact, let's further imagine having a "family tradition" that says your inherited wealth and power, and great position amongst mankind, has to do with your Destiny. From an early age, you are told that you were born to rule, and that "commoners" are born to serve. Only occasionally do you question these "inbred" notions, perhaps when you actually encounter a commoner who seems smarter than you, but no matter. They are poor, you are rich and perhaps even royal, and your ancestry goes back a long ways, proving how special you are. However, not all is as you might have it. For example, when you are old enough, you also learn that you are not going to be allowed to simply marry anyone you please. But, you don't worry too much about it, because they have explained quite conveniently the true function of "marriage", and it is nothing like the commoner version at all! Traditional marriage, in the Western sense is regarded as necessary to aid in controlling the unruly masses, but like most rules, they simply do not apply to the masters, only to the slaves. True, you might occasionally be tempted to lead a "simple" life, and wonder what things might be like if you weren't burdened with the Care of your subjects, but for the most part, you wouldn't have it any other way. And besides, it's your Destiny to rule!
No doubt, images of the British Royals swam in your mind as you read the above. Certainly there are people who, for better or for worse, are "born to rule". Of course, most of us might indulge in the notion that these old remnants of the past will one day be history, and all shall eventually be equal, and there will be truth and justice for all, etc. But "what if" the powers that be have no intention of allowing their vast power to slip away from them...EVER. Perhaps you feel this would be unrealistic, and you might even mention the "fact" that most royal families are already "history", which would seem to confirm the idea that the old ways are truly fading. But what if some, or even just a handful of powerful families today believed that it was their destiny to rule FOREVER? You know, even if they merely believed in such a fanciful thing, you would have to think that, with all their power, they could still do many things in their attempt to accomplish their goal. What would that look like?
Perhaps, as they began to discern the changing times, they would make use of all the power they had to "engineer" or manipulate events to their ends. They could perhaps start a war. Or maybe they would create organizations that seemingly had one purpose, but secretly had another. Or, they could simply infiltrate existing useful organizations, with the intention of molding them to their purposes. If for some reason, another dynasty proved to be a cross-purposes to theirs, they could bring entire nations into the battle. With such dynamics as these in play, even crafty outsiders might see incredible opportunities for profit, and get in on the action. In short, we would likely see a world "at war", with most of it going on in secret. A world a lot like we live in today.
But what of the title now? Masonry, oh of course, but Mormonism? And Islam, well, maybe that could be useful, seeing as how they were implicated in the false-flag attack of 9/11. But Mormonism? Pahleeze!
One thing that Mormon scholars have had to deal with over the years is the fact that much of their symbolism appears to have been "borrowed" you might say, from Masonry. Of course, for those who maintain that Joseph Smith was certainly a Mason, it would all make sense, but remember that the devout Mormon must believe that their religion is much more than that. After all, there were Golden Plates, and there is today a most special Book of Mormon, all "proving" the truth of what they believe. In other words, they believe their religion is divine, while the rest of us dismiss it as merely human. But let's suspend judgment just a bit perhaps, and wait to see what pans out.
Now let's put Mormonism aside for a moment. Isn't it interesting that Masonry "borrows" so much from...Islam? Oh, you haven't thought about it quite like that before? Ever see that scimitar (sword) on the Shriner's hat? How about the "crescent moon" and star underneath? Well, what do the Masons say? It seems that they regard their history as having direct roots in the Muslim world after all The way the story goes is that during the Crusades, some knights captured Jerusalem, and discovered Solomon's Temple. The Knights Templar is naturally what they called themselves, and it's a historical fact that after their time in Palestine, they became fabulously wealthy, to the point where major conflict developed with various royals who felt threatened by them. Masonry asserts that not merely wealth came of their "discovery", but even more importantly, secret ("occult" or hidden) knowledge. Again, let's not immediately dismiss these ideas. In fact, at the time of the Crusades, Europe had fallen far from the Classical Age, and learning was barely being kept on life-support in monasteries. However, in the Arab world, a sort of "pax arabica" had spawned a Golden Age, and everywhere in the Muslim world was learning and knowledge on the increase. Mathematics is the most famous Arab discipline that Europe received, but that was not the only thing. Medicine, literature, astronomy, etc. On every front, knowledge was expanding. So, looking at the old Templar story should not cause too much doubt, even if there was no Solomon's Temple. They may have easily absorbed important knowledge from what was at the time a superior culture.
Back to Mormonism now. It may be difficult to fathom, but if there were very powerful people in the world who wanted a useful club, organization, or even religion formed, they could make the necessary arrangements. A more modern example of such a contrived "religion" might be Dianetics. Either way, whether Mormonism was intentionally created for some reason, or not, it still may prove to serve "their" purpose. But we're not quite there yet. One thing we should do, as we look back at how Mormonism has been "used", and how it is being used today, and how it may be used in the near future, we must ask: Who benefits? And regarding the future, what might Mormonism have to do with Islam of all things? More on that in Part Two...
No doubt, images of the British Royals swam in your mind as you read the above. Certainly there are people who, for better or for worse, are "born to rule". Of course, most of us might indulge in the notion that these old remnants of the past will one day be history, and all shall eventually be equal, and there will be truth and justice for all, etc. But "what if" the powers that be have no intention of allowing their vast power to slip away from them...EVER. Perhaps you feel this would be unrealistic, and you might even mention the "fact" that most royal families are already "history", which would seem to confirm the idea that the old ways are truly fading. But what if some, or even just a handful of powerful families today believed that it was their destiny to rule FOREVER? You know, even if they merely believed in such a fanciful thing, you would have to think that, with all their power, they could still do many things in their attempt to accomplish their goal. What would that look like?
Perhaps, as they began to discern the changing times, they would make use of all the power they had to "engineer" or manipulate events to their ends. They could perhaps start a war. Or maybe they would create organizations that seemingly had one purpose, but secretly had another. Or, they could simply infiltrate existing useful organizations, with the intention of molding them to their purposes. If for some reason, another dynasty proved to be a cross-purposes to theirs, they could bring entire nations into the battle. With such dynamics as these in play, even crafty outsiders might see incredible opportunities for profit, and get in on the action. In short, we would likely see a world "at war", with most of it going on in secret. A world a lot like we live in today.
But what of the title now? Masonry, oh of course, but Mormonism? And Islam, well, maybe that could be useful, seeing as how they were implicated in the false-flag attack of 9/11. But Mormonism? Pahleeze!
One thing that Mormon scholars have had to deal with over the years is the fact that much of their symbolism appears to have been "borrowed" you might say, from Masonry. Of course, for those who maintain that Joseph Smith was certainly a Mason, it would all make sense, but remember that the devout Mormon must believe that their religion is much more than that. After all, there were Golden Plates, and there is today a most special Book of Mormon, all "proving" the truth of what they believe. In other words, they believe their religion is divine, while the rest of us dismiss it as merely human. But let's suspend judgment just a bit perhaps, and wait to see what pans out.
Now let's put Mormonism aside for a moment. Isn't it interesting that Masonry "borrows" so much from...Islam? Oh, you haven't thought about it quite like that before? Ever see that scimitar (sword) on the Shriner's hat? How about the "crescent moon" and star underneath? Well, what do the Masons say? It seems that they regard their history as having direct roots in the Muslim world after all The way the story goes is that during the Crusades, some knights captured Jerusalem, and discovered Solomon's Temple. The Knights Templar is naturally what they called themselves, and it's a historical fact that after their time in Palestine, they became fabulously wealthy, to the point where major conflict developed with various royals who felt threatened by them. Masonry asserts that not merely wealth came of their "discovery", but even more importantly, secret ("occult" or hidden) knowledge. Again, let's not immediately dismiss these ideas. In fact, at the time of the Crusades, Europe had fallen far from the Classical Age, and learning was barely being kept on life-support in monasteries. However, in the Arab world, a sort of "pax arabica" had spawned a Golden Age, and everywhere in the Muslim world was learning and knowledge on the increase. Mathematics is the most famous Arab discipline that Europe received, but that was not the only thing. Medicine, literature, astronomy, etc. On every front, knowledge was expanding. So, looking at the old Templar story should not cause too much doubt, even if there was no Solomon's Temple. They may have easily absorbed important knowledge from what was at the time a superior culture.
Back to Mormonism now. It may be difficult to fathom, but if there were very powerful people in the world who wanted a useful club, organization, or even religion formed, they could make the necessary arrangements. A more modern example of such a contrived "religion" might be Dianetics. Either way, whether Mormonism was intentionally created for some reason, or not, it still may prove to serve "their" purpose. But we're not quite there yet. One thing we should do, as we look back at how Mormonism has been "used", and how it is being used today, and how it may be used in the near future, we must ask: Who benefits? And regarding the future, what might Mormonism have to do with Islam of all things? More on that in Part Two...
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Ebay Declares All-Out War on Sellers As Donahoe Takes His Revenge
Ebay recently announced upcoming changes to their ongoing seller-extermination pogrom. Chief Executive Cocksucker Donahoe comments on the matter were secretly recorded by one of his rogue staff members. Donahoe simply said, "Fuck the goddamn sellers!"
A lot of water under the bridge already of course, since Donahoe has singlehandedly killed off hundreds of thousands of small and medium sellers over the past few years, while his diabolical seller inquisition mercilessly rolls forward. Naturally, sellers loathe the piece-of-shit, and aren't as shy as they used to be when denouncing his utterly retarded and insane innovations. As a result, the son-of-a-bitch has taken a bit of flak here and there from stock analysts, who are starting to figure out "who" the problem is over at eBay. This has angered Dickahoe, and he has charged his staff to "get tough", and "take out as many sellers as possible, as soon as possible!"
Immediately, dozens of ass-kissing subservients went into high gear, and their latest pogrom means only the real big sellers can remain. Why is this? Because the real big sellers have special "contracts" with eBay, which is another way to say the "rules" don't apply to them. Ever wonder how the biggest sellers, racking up a hundred negative feedbacks PER DAY are considered "Top Rated"? No, it's not just that they beat the statistics, it's that their contracts literally say they don't have to worry about the idiotic eBay rules. And this makes sense, because big sellers would never sign up for a "coin-toss" business, allocating a sizable investment, only to have silly eBay rules stop them dead in the water. That would never fly, and besides, if you're big enough, you could even sue the eBeast.
And so the small and "medium" sellers are done for. By the way, before you decide none of this applies to you, you are a "good" seller, or maybe you are a "big" seller, you had better really read about the upcoming changes. Remember, all this is already on top of the infamous "no negative" policy, and the ludicrous "DSR's", and the recent massive fee increases (eBay cast this biggest fee increase EVER as the lowest fees ever!). Now, you are going to have to hope that the Post Office, or UPS, or whoever you use, does their job, EVERY TIME. If they drop the ball even once, you're screwed!
Here's how it works. If one of your beloved buyers should open a "Dispute", because they didn't get their item, it will now count against you. Wait a minute! That sounds fair. "Why don't you crafty sellers just give us our stuff?!" Look closely. The buyer merely has to open the dispute, and it counts. Do you ship out "same day"? It doesn't matter! Do you always use tracking numbers? It doesn't matter! Again, read it and weep. If the buyer merely opens a dispute, you've got a problem. You may show a tracking number, that you shipped immediately, and you might even protest that it's only been two fucking days since they made the purchase! You argue that it's utterly impossible for the item to arrive 3,000 miles away so fast! Too bad. Now get this, you "good" seller, the buyer just hosed you...FOR LIFE.
Yes, for most small and medium sellers, the mere opening of a dispute, regardless of circumstances, ends your eBay "career". Because in order to get the visibility you need on eBay, you MUST be a "Top Rated" seller. And to be Top Rated, you are only allowed one-quarter-of-one-percent (0.25%) of opened disputes. To put this into perspective, lets say you sell 400 items. If even ONE of the 400 experiences a delay that displeases the buyer, you're OUT!! Oh, you're a "big" seller, who sells thousands of items? Really? Do you sell thousands PER DAY? In fact, the big "contract" sellers DO sell thousands per day in many cases. Again, some perspective. What if you sell 1,000 items per month? That's already put you in the top rung, by far, compared to most sellers. BUT, the same quarter-percent still applies! You get TWO (and a half) nutty and/or impatient buyers, and that's IT. Oh, so you sell $100,000 per month? Tough shit. Out you go! It's actually worse than this. You could sell three items to ONE buyer, and combine his shipping, and off it goes in one package. But you're not "lucky" that month, what a shame, that one buyer just opened up a dispute, uh no, make that THREE disputes! No worries! Ebay has the solution for you! You can globally set your preferences so that a buyer can only buy one of your items at a time! Yes! That's it! When you have a buyer, maybe a repeat buyer, and he wants to honestly buy multiple items from you, tell him to take a hike! After all, it's the only way you can insulate yourself from having one "unlucky" incident turn into many! Dumbahoe, you can't be serious...
Donahoe needs to be stopped. The sociopath has proved he won't, and it may in fact be "personal" at this point. He knows the sellers hate him. He knows they are right, and now the only thing the worthless cocksucker can do is retaliate. He is literally in the process of burning the house down before he bails out! Stop him you negligent Board of Directors! Punish the asshole! You can SUE him! All you have to do is just document a tiny bit of his insanity, and you can fire him without even having to pay him off! Sue him! If he's smart, he'll know that the truth about his ineptness can't get out, or he will never earn that kind of undeserved money again. He'll be good, you'll see! FIRE him. And even if you do just pay him off, it will be far cheaper than letting him continue. Do it now, before eBay is history...
A lot of water under the bridge already of course, since Donahoe has singlehandedly killed off hundreds of thousands of small and medium sellers over the past few years, while his diabolical seller inquisition mercilessly rolls forward. Naturally, sellers loathe the piece-of-shit, and aren't as shy as they used to be when denouncing his utterly retarded and insane innovations. As a result, the son-of-a-bitch has taken a bit of flak here and there from stock analysts, who are starting to figure out "who" the problem is over at eBay. This has angered Dickahoe, and he has charged his staff to "get tough", and "take out as many sellers as possible, as soon as possible!"
Immediately, dozens of ass-kissing subservients went into high gear, and their latest pogrom means only the real big sellers can remain. Why is this? Because the real big sellers have special "contracts" with eBay, which is another way to say the "rules" don't apply to them. Ever wonder how the biggest sellers, racking up a hundred negative feedbacks PER DAY are considered "Top Rated"? No, it's not just that they beat the statistics, it's that their contracts literally say they don't have to worry about the idiotic eBay rules. And this makes sense, because big sellers would never sign up for a "coin-toss" business, allocating a sizable investment, only to have silly eBay rules stop them dead in the water. That would never fly, and besides, if you're big enough, you could even sue the eBeast.
And so the small and "medium" sellers are done for. By the way, before you decide none of this applies to you, you are a "good" seller, or maybe you are a "big" seller, you had better really read about the upcoming changes. Remember, all this is already on top of the infamous "no negative" policy, and the ludicrous "DSR's", and the recent massive fee increases (eBay cast this biggest fee increase EVER as the lowest fees ever!). Now, you are going to have to hope that the Post Office, or UPS, or whoever you use, does their job, EVERY TIME. If they drop the ball even once, you're screwed!
Here's how it works. If one of your beloved buyers should open a "Dispute", because they didn't get their item, it will now count against you. Wait a minute! That sounds fair. "Why don't you crafty sellers just give us our stuff?!" Look closely. The buyer merely has to open the dispute, and it counts. Do you ship out "same day"? It doesn't matter! Do you always use tracking numbers? It doesn't matter! Again, read it and weep. If the buyer merely opens a dispute, you've got a problem. You may show a tracking number, that you shipped immediately, and you might even protest that it's only been two fucking days since they made the purchase! You argue that it's utterly impossible for the item to arrive 3,000 miles away so fast! Too bad. Now get this, you "good" seller, the buyer just hosed you...FOR LIFE.
Yes, for most small and medium sellers, the mere opening of a dispute, regardless of circumstances, ends your eBay "career". Because in order to get the visibility you need on eBay, you MUST be a "Top Rated" seller. And to be Top Rated, you are only allowed one-quarter-of-one-percent (0.25%) of opened disputes. To put this into perspective, lets say you sell 400 items. If even ONE of the 400 experiences a delay that displeases the buyer, you're OUT!! Oh, you're a "big" seller, who sells thousands of items? Really? Do you sell thousands PER DAY? In fact, the big "contract" sellers DO sell thousands per day in many cases. Again, some perspective. What if you sell 1,000 items per month? That's already put you in the top rung, by far, compared to most sellers. BUT, the same quarter-percent still applies! You get TWO (and a half) nutty and/or impatient buyers, and that's IT. Oh, so you sell $100,000 per month? Tough shit. Out you go! It's actually worse than this. You could sell three items to ONE buyer, and combine his shipping, and off it goes in one package. But you're not "lucky" that month, what a shame, that one buyer just opened up a dispute, uh no, make that THREE disputes! No worries! Ebay has the solution for you! You can globally set your preferences so that a buyer can only buy one of your items at a time! Yes! That's it! When you have a buyer, maybe a repeat buyer, and he wants to honestly buy multiple items from you, tell him to take a hike! After all, it's the only way you can insulate yourself from having one "unlucky" incident turn into many! Dumbahoe, you can't be serious...
Donahoe needs to be stopped. The sociopath has proved he won't, and it may in fact be "personal" at this point. He knows the sellers hate him. He knows they are right, and now the only thing the worthless cocksucker can do is retaliate. He is literally in the process of burning the house down before he bails out! Stop him you negligent Board of Directors! Punish the asshole! You can SUE him! All you have to do is just document a tiny bit of his insanity, and you can fire him without even having to pay him off! Sue him! If he's smart, he'll know that the truth about his ineptness can't get out, or he will never earn that kind of undeserved money again. He'll be good, you'll see! FIRE him. And even if you do just pay him off, it will be far cheaper than letting him continue. Do it now, before eBay is history...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)